Firstly how about we stop unlimited pensions for politicians that are no longer working. Secondly lower politicians wages and perks. Thirdly stop sending money overseas to help other countries until we are back in the green.
DC, with respect it appears you're being rude to Peter. Can I suggest you watch this podcast with retired U.S.A.F. general and frmr U.S. rep. to NATO, with retired USAF colonels and special forces operator. They are all very familiar with the current Globalist status.
You're welcome. I realise it’s a massive paradigm shift. Still, if you’re like me and take most things with a large grain of salt, try doing what I’ve done for the past couple of years: interpret ongoing events through the official Globalist narrative as an intellectual exercise. The dots start connecting very convincingly.
My journey to this perspective came through several money market analysts—people whose job is to dig deep and uncover the real events and players shaping the geopolitical landscape.
Tom Luongo was the one who first introduced me to the "Globalist" narrative about three years ago. His analysis of Fed Chair Jerome Powell acting against the interests of the EU really caught my attention. In his distinctive (and often blunt) style, I remember him saying something like "Powell is at war with Germany."
Tom appears to be onto something. His YouTube podcast views have exploded in recent months, and his online profile has grown rapidly. I suspect this is because the "City of London" (Globalist) narrative is gaining momentum, as other analysts with similar—relatively unconventional—views start connecting, cross-referencing, and amplifying each other. This is evident in the Tommy Carrigan podcast episode you watched.
The City of London? It's often described as the unofficial headquarters of Globalist power. For a deeper explanation, check out Prof. Richard Werner describing how the City of London exists outside the UK jurisdiction. The full 15-minute interview is easy to find online—just search for it.
Thanks again, Steve, as I did watch these today. It sort of gives me an idea of what you are digesting online. Keep in mind, you will notice many talking heads shows available to watch in the right-hand sidebar of the screen. Each one suits a certain mindset. I know Mr. Blain as he has been appearing on shows lately where the military veterans who are participating in the "operation" discuss events. I watch those, if anything at all.
You will want to hear these people explain how America has been under martial law and military occupation since January 2021. Continuity of Government measures that have been installed, Constitution suspended, etc. Among many other things, I notice Mr. Blain does not bring these things up, yet he knows of them.
On the topic of City Of London, can you see how the cabal is being steadily crushed, for example, by the "military operation" in The Straits of Hormuz?
Yes, it certainly appears the Trump admin has the City of London under a lot of pressure. Lots of moving parts to this story make it hard to know exactly how far along they are from being totally crushed. This could be a decade/s long push. It certainly seems like the U.S. is preferring to negotiate a surrender (I saw Cuba announce as much online). If it's true the U.S., Russia, and potentially China are sharing intel and coordinating actions, then I'm filled with confidence.
The Martial Law narrative is interesting, but like all narratives, I don't give it a lot of weight until I see more conclusive evidence or dots connecting. I would imagine it's not prudent to reveal all the moving parts until an advanced stage, when certainty of success has been confirmed. Was it BH that mentioned last week Obama engaged 8 criminal lawyers?
You're right, I have come to limit my diet of geopolitics to those talking the 'All roads lead to London' narrative, only because as I mentioned, Tom L. has been nailing it for long enough for me to ignore the others. Also, I like the characters assembling, as their various hidden connections have them thinking along the same lines.
I'm not rude to anyone here, Steve. It may seem rude to people when a totally different perspective is brought to the table, with confidence. Questions put to people should be what invigorates us to "let's talk about". It's how we learn.
DC, the globalists exist at the Global Government forum in Dubai, at the World Economic Forum meetings in Switzerland and China, in London's Old City, in the Vatican, in Washington DC, and, until recently, on Epstein's Island.
They control the governments you vote for.
They control the militaries by proxy via governments - which is how they profit from both sides of every war.
We don't have democracy, we've never had it in Australia - we've only ever had the illusion of democracy.
That's why we get what the globalists want regardless of which branch of the globalists' UNiparty gets into office.
Thanks for replying, Peter. I see that you answered only the third question I posed to you. That's okay for now.
I would hint to you that you could put each of your sentences into past tense. What is left of the cabal around the world are simply the lower-level minions. They await instructions from overlords, unaware that their masters have been eliminated or replaced. Greed or coercion has them tied to their posts for now, but they are monitored by a vast military network of good people.
I answered your last three questions, DC, the answer to the first one is self-evident, particularly after Bondi.
I see you've taken the white pills.
I only wish the white-pillers were right: but white-pilling seems more like a psyop to me, designed to get good men to stand down and "trust the plan"...
How's that worked out so far?
Yeah, nah, if "Hillary was in Gitmo" we wouldn't be rocketing toward dystopian tyranny, complete with digital ID, digital currency, 15-minute cities, and no free speech.
The purpose of a system is what it does - and there's no legitimate reason for "putting body doubles in" for the Hillarys, the Baracks, and the Schwabs of the world and continuing the rush to dystopian hell.
The system is still rushing us to dystopian hell because that's what it's designed to do.
Here, DC, have some black pills; burst that shiny bubble and look at the real-world landscape.
Try to reply without the indignation, Peter. It is unnecessary for the theme "Let's Talk About It" as Ralph's Substack suggests here.
I don't take any pills. I just take facts and investigate them myself. You don't understand that there is a 'plan' because it hasn't been explained to you properly OR there is insufficient IQ (this sounds rude, yes, but I feel it doesn't pertain to you).
So, instead of reacting badly like you have, why not investigate all this privately with someone like me who has learned? Is it above you to learn outside of what you think you know? I hope it is possible. I would set some time aside for people like yourself, as I do for others. Point you in a better direction.
You could be comfortable like me and my family who see theatre being on our screens by the military operation. Pre-planned and strategic. It is made for the target audience who are believing everything they see and hear. There is an obvious reason it is being done this way.
Spot on, the days of surpluses are finished under Labor. The massive deficits are partly attributable to spending overseas to attract votes from Islamic communities in Australia and other minority groups, foreign entities including Islamic, Afghanistan. It is not surprising the 2025/26 deficit is now forecast at $36.8bn and a deficit of $21.1 billion. No wonder familes are struggling under debt. The vast majority of two-parent families with dependent children rely on both parents working to manage living costs, with 73% of these families having both parents employed as of June 2025 (ABS data).
Expect the budget to be a train wreck with new taxes as Labor aims at retirees and superannuation funds to address the deficit. The socialist MO is to come after your money as Labor cannot manage the budget.
"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money"
Our problem, particularly in Victoria, is that the population and businesses have run out of money due to the high taxes.
This week a farmer's farm was rezoned and now he owes the Government a 'windfall gain tax' totalling over $3million. Where is he supposed to get that from?
Jacinta Allan (Victoria) faces ongoing scrutiny over allegations of CFMEU corruption on major infrastructure projects, including claims that billions in taxpayer funds were funneled to criminal networks. Despite repeated allegations, she has ruled out a Royal Commission, stating that previous inquiries were ineffective. The issue has sparked political pressure, internal leaks, and public criticism, with some suggesting the government was "cowed" by union influence.
(surprise surprise ... Yorick Piper (husband) is a "former" official of the CFMEU )
... and she is still working for her and her husband's future.
Socialist governments always overspend, just look at Argentina it had to be rescued by a common sense government because money became worthless and it has happened all throughout history. This rabble in Australia could not run a hot dog stand let alone a country.
Ralph, let’s discuss the fact that the governments since 1960 have been altering Our 1901 Commonwealth Constitution so they can Steal Our Rights Our Wealth and Our Futures… all without any referendums! That’s treason! If we Restore Our Constitution we Regain Our Rights! Save Our Country! 🙏🏼
25 years ago, Pentagon war planners knew horrific consequences of war in the Strait of Hormuz
We’re seeing those consequences now.
Oil tankers stacked up and refusing to enter that kill zone. Other ships carrying sulfur for copper mining and fertilizers for crops also refusing.
Global energy prices are spiking and going higher every day. Meaning the prices of ALL goods are rising.
The war planners have always assumed—wrongly—that a blockage in the Strait of Hormuz would only last a few days. Because overwhelming US military force would quickly decimate an adversary like Iran.
The planners ignored a truly scandalous military simulation from 2002—their own exercise called Millennium Challenge.
This wasn’t just a tabletop exercise. It was a $250 million war game involving 13,000 US soldiers.
There were two teams. The US side—the blue team—and the Iran-like bad guys—the red team.
The red team was headed up by retired US General Paul Van Riper. Yes, that’s his real name.
Van Riper used a variety of quick asymmetric strategies and blew the blue team out of the water.
This was terribly embarrassing to the Pentagon, who stopped the whole war game immediately and “reset” it. With new rules and limitations that guaranteed a blue team US victory.
General Van Riper used tactics Iran has been putting in place for at least 20 years. Small fast attack boats in the Strait of Hormuz. Mines placed in the water. Missiles fired from hidden locations on the shore. (You can now add drones to the overall approach.)
Van Riper proved Iran choking off the Strait wouldn’t just last a few days:
He proved energy prices would rise and keep rising for an undetermined period. Which is what’s happening now.
Trump’s response has been to set aside $20 billion in “insurance policies” for the big tankers—because insurance companies have canceled their policies. Trump has also offered US Navy ships to accompany the tankers through the Strait kill zone. But so far, no takers.
The Pentagon has had a vivid model of this situation for 25 years. —The model it tested and then rejected, because the truth was too embarrassing.
In other words, the truth was not the real goal of the 2002 Millennium Challenge war game exercise. Protecting the nation wasn’t the goal. Protecting the precious asses of US military big shots was the objective, when push came to shove.
Asserting ‘US military might is unbeatable’ was the narrative the Pentagon was selling. It was selling public relations.
Trump is now selling the same PR.
The American people are watching how that’s turning out in the real world. Day by day…
For as long as the Strait of Hormuz is choked off. Preventing 20% of global oil from passing through.
The problem is, no one is addressing the banking problem. Quite simply the banks create credit out of nothing, and then have the audacity to charge interest on the money they create out of the same nothing. Unless the way money is created, nothing, and I mean NOTHING, is going to change. You can talk about taxes, and hand outs, and this and that, till the cows come home, and it will make no difference at all. The government has the power to create legal tender and spend it into circulation. It was what Abe Lincoln did when the banksters of his day, who were willing to lend him all the money he needed to fight the civil war, but of course for a high rate of interest. So ole Abe printed money called green backs and gave it the backing of his government and spent it into circulation. Of course this annoyed the banksters and for his by-passing the bankers he wore a bullet. Yes, doing the right comes with, shall we say; certain risks. Is there anyone in Oz politics today who has the courage to take on the banksters AND DEFEAT THEM?
Article II, Section 4 of the United States Constitution establishes the grounds and scope for the removal of federal officials. It states that the President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from office upon impeachment for, and conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
We, the People, and Congress need to enforce this!
Firstly how about we stop unlimited pensions for politicians that are no longer working. Secondly lower politicians wages and perks. Thirdly stop sending money overseas to help other countries until we are back in the green.
Clive, I really appreciate you but the times are now desperate.
We need all clear-thinking Aussies to put egos aside and unite against the globalists and their useful idiots.
We need UAP to join with One Nation, who have the battle standard with the most flak holes from spending the most time over the target.
We need you to put your money into ON.
We need you *and* Pauline to listen carefully to Barnaby, whose political instincts are unmatched.
We *cannot* afford to send preferences back to any branch of the UNiparty because of rivalry between right-wing groups.
All those old rivalries will be ridiculously irrelevant if the globalists succeed in using Jews and Muslims to collapse White Western democracies.
Peter, I want to ask you why you think 'globalists' are STILL using "Jews and Muslims to collapse White Western Democracies"?
Do you not think that the problem has always been 'democracy'?
Do these 'globalists' still exist in your mind?
If so, how can they exist in this current military environment?
DC, with respect it appears you're being rude to Peter. Can I suggest you watch this podcast with retired U.S.A.F. general and frmr U.S. rep. to NATO, with retired USAF colonels and special forces operator. They are all very familiar with the current Globalist status.
https://youtu.be/vmVUtQhStZI?si=_V-NwtWnWAKRHBsy
I watched your You Tube video, Steve. Interesting. Thanks mate.
You're welcome. I realise it’s a massive paradigm shift. Still, if you’re like me and take most things with a large grain of salt, try doing what I’ve done for the past couple of years: interpret ongoing events through the official Globalist narrative as an intellectual exercise. The dots start connecting very convincingly.
My journey to this perspective came through several money market analysts—people whose job is to dig deep and uncover the real events and players shaping the geopolitical landscape.
Tom Luongo was the one who first introduced me to the "Globalist" narrative about three years ago. His analysis of Fed Chair Jerome Powell acting against the interests of the EU really caught my attention. In his distinctive (and often blunt) style, I remember him saying something like "Powell is at war with Germany."
Tom appears to be onto something. His YouTube podcast views have exploded in recent months, and his online profile has grown rapidly. I suspect this is because the "City of London" (Globalist) narrative is gaining momentum, as other analysts with similar—relatively unconventional—views start connecting, cross-referencing, and amplifying each other. This is evident in the Tommy Carrigan podcast episode you watched.
The City of London? It's often described as the unofficial headquarters of Globalist power. For a deeper explanation, check out Prof. Richard Werner describing how the City of London exists outside the UK jurisdiction. The full 15-minute interview is easy to find online—just search for it.
https://youtu.be/nLOE2L71RRI?si=IFYSgsPh_CTFrAfm
Link below is his latest pod, again with retired general Blain Holt, 2nd-highest ranking U.S. military official at NATO.
https://youtu.be/qmpXqOIH8Ho?si=6Dfx2AZWyYnPNskH
@petercampion Are you following any of the City of London narrative?
Thanks again, Steve, as I did watch these today. It sort of gives me an idea of what you are digesting online. Keep in mind, you will notice many talking heads shows available to watch in the right-hand sidebar of the screen. Each one suits a certain mindset. I know Mr. Blain as he has been appearing on shows lately where the military veterans who are participating in the "operation" discuss events. I watch those, if anything at all.
You will want to hear these people explain how America has been under martial law and military occupation since January 2021. Continuity of Government measures that have been installed, Constitution suspended, etc. Among many other things, I notice Mr. Blain does not bring these things up, yet he knows of them.
On the topic of City Of London, can you see how the cabal is being steadily crushed, for example, by the "military operation" in The Straits of Hormuz?
Yes, it certainly appears the Trump admin has the City of London under a lot of pressure. Lots of moving parts to this story make it hard to know exactly how far along they are from being totally crushed. This could be a decade/s long push. It certainly seems like the U.S. is preferring to negotiate a surrender (I saw Cuba announce as much online). If it's true the U.S., Russia, and potentially China are sharing intel and coordinating actions, then I'm filled with confidence.
The Martial Law narrative is interesting, but like all narratives, I don't give it a lot of weight until I see more conclusive evidence or dots connecting. I would imagine it's not prudent to reveal all the moving parts until an advanced stage, when certainty of success has been confirmed. Was it BH that mentioned last week Obama engaged 8 criminal lawyers?
You're right, I have come to limit my diet of geopolitics to those talking the 'All roads lead to London' narrative, only because as I mentioned, Tom L. has been nailing it for long enough for me to ignore the others. Also, I like the characters assembling, as their various hidden connections have them thinking along the same lines.
I'm not rude to anyone here, Steve. It may seem rude to people when a totally different perspective is brought to the table, with confidence. Questions put to people should be what invigorates us to "let's talk about". It's how we learn.
DC, the globalists exist at the Global Government forum in Dubai, at the World Economic Forum meetings in Switzerland and China, in London's Old City, in the Vatican, in Washington DC, and, until recently, on Epstein's Island.
They control the governments you vote for.
They control the militaries by proxy via governments - which is how they profit from both sides of every war.
We don't have democracy, we've never had it in Australia - we've only ever had the illusion of democracy.
That's why we get what the globalists want regardless of which branch of the globalists' UNiparty gets into office.
Hi Peter, my post above to Daddy Cool you may be interested to read.
https://senatorbabet.substack.com/p/the-government-has-a-spending-problem?utm_campaign=comment-list-share-cta&utm_medium=web&comments=true&commentId=227027559
Thanks for replying, Peter. I see that you answered only the third question I posed to you. That's okay for now.
I would hint to you that you could put each of your sentences into past tense. What is left of the cabal around the world are simply the lower-level minions. They await instructions from overlords, unaware that their masters have been eliminated or replaced. Greed or coercion has them tied to their posts for now, but they are monitored by a vast military network of good people.
Wonderful times ahead for everyone.
I answered your last three questions, DC, the answer to the first one is self-evident, particularly after Bondi.
I see you've taken the white pills.
I only wish the white-pillers were right: but white-pilling seems more like a psyop to me, designed to get good men to stand down and "trust the plan"...
How's that worked out so far?
Yeah, nah, if "Hillary was in Gitmo" we wouldn't be rocketing toward dystopian tyranny, complete with digital ID, digital currency, 15-minute cities, and no free speech.
The purpose of a system is what it does - and there's no legitimate reason for "putting body doubles in" for the Hillarys, the Baracks, and the Schwabs of the world and continuing the rush to dystopian hell.
The system is still rushing us to dystopian hell because that's what it's designed to do.
Here, DC, have some black pills; burst that shiny bubble and look at the real-world landscape.
Try to reply without the indignation, Peter. It is unnecessary for the theme "Let's Talk About It" as Ralph's Substack suggests here.
I don't take any pills. I just take facts and investigate them myself. You don't understand that there is a 'plan' because it hasn't been explained to you properly OR there is insufficient IQ (this sounds rude, yes, but I feel it doesn't pertain to you).
So, instead of reacting badly like you have, why not investigate all this privately with someone like me who has learned? Is it above you to learn outside of what you think you know? I hope it is possible. I would set some time aside for people like yourself, as I do for others. Point you in a better direction.
You could be comfortable like me and my family who see theatre being on our screens by the military operation. Pre-planned and strategic. It is made for the target audience who are believing everything they see and hear. There is an obvious reason it is being done this way.
My door is open.
bit late mate. it's already a done deal
That's interesting, Don, the last I heard was that talks on both merging and funding had broken down...
What have you heard and could you please link us to it?
Observation
Have a look at England
Have a look at Sweden
Have a look at theatre
The Melting Pot.
Break down of tradition and culture in the Western World.
Have a look at who’s calling the shots.
There’s an adage.
If you want to know who rules over you.
Look at who you cannot criticise.
Old news and very negative. Your answer did not address Peter's question.
Spot on, the days of surpluses are finished under Labor. The massive deficits are partly attributable to spending overseas to attract votes from Islamic communities in Australia and other minority groups, foreign entities including Islamic, Afghanistan. It is not surprising the 2025/26 deficit is now forecast at $36.8bn and a deficit of $21.1 billion. No wonder familes are struggling under debt. The vast majority of two-parent families with dependent children rely on both parents working to manage living costs, with 73% of these families having both parents employed as of June 2025 (ABS data).
Expect the budget to be a train wreck with new taxes as Labor aims at retirees and superannuation funds to address the deficit. The socialist MO is to come after your money as Labor cannot manage the budget.
Margaret Thatcher was correct when she said
"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money"
Our problem, particularly in Victoria, is that the population and businesses have run out of money due to the high taxes.
This week a farmer's farm was rezoned and now he owes the Government a 'windfall gain tax' totalling over $3million. Where is he supposed to get that from?
Sir. for now, the only way you can help Australia is to join ON.
This is in parts where your money goes:
Jacinta Allan (Victoria) faces ongoing scrutiny over allegations of CFMEU corruption on major infrastructure projects, including claims that billions in taxpayer funds were funneled to criminal networks. Despite repeated allegations, she has ruled out a Royal Commission, stating that previous inquiries were ineffective. The issue has sparked political pressure, internal leaks, and public criticism, with some suggesting the government was "cowed" by union influence.
(surprise surprise ... Yorick Piper (husband) is a "former" official of the CFMEU )
... and she is still working for her and her husband's future.
"public criticism" *lol* you can't make that up.
TRUMP250 🇺🇲♥️🇮🇱, after the war in Ukraine and Iran we just can't afford politicians any longer. Please collect your things and get a real job.
We all know how to fix it and we can start by supporting David Pocock's enquiry into our gas exports
Socialist governments always overspend, just look at Argentina it had to be rescued by a common sense government because money became worthless and it has happened all throughout history. This rabble in Australia could not run a hot dog stand let alone a country.
Ralph, let’s discuss the fact that the governments since 1960 have been altering Our 1901 Commonwealth Constitution so they can Steal Our Rights Our Wealth and Our Futures… all without any referendums! That’s treason! If we Restore Our Constitution we Regain Our Rights! Save Our Country! 🙏🏼
25 years ago, Pentagon war planners knew horrific consequences of war in the Strait of Hormuz
We’re seeing those consequences now.
Oil tankers stacked up and refusing to enter that kill zone. Other ships carrying sulfur for copper mining and fertilizers for crops also refusing.
Global energy prices are spiking and going higher every day. Meaning the prices of ALL goods are rising.
The war planners have always assumed—wrongly—that a blockage in the Strait of Hormuz would only last a few days. Because overwhelming US military force would quickly decimate an adversary like Iran.
The planners ignored a truly scandalous military simulation from 2002—their own exercise called Millennium Challenge.
This wasn’t just a tabletop exercise. It was a $250 million war game involving 13,000 US soldiers.
There were two teams. The US side—the blue team—and the Iran-like bad guys—the red team.
The red team was headed up by retired US General Paul Van Riper. Yes, that’s his real name.
Van Riper used a variety of quick asymmetric strategies and blew the blue team out of the water.
This was terribly embarrassing to the Pentagon, who stopped the whole war game immediately and “reset” it. With new rules and limitations that guaranteed a blue team US victory.
General Van Riper used tactics Iran has been putting in place for at least 20 years. Small fast attack boats in the Strait of Hormuz. Mines placed in the water. Missiles fired from hidden locations on the shore. (You can now add drones to the overall approach.)
Van Riper proved Iran choking off the Strait wouldn’t just last a few days:
He proved energy prices would rise and keep rising for an undetermined period. Which is what’s happening now.
Trump’s response has been to set aside $20 billion in “insurance policies” for the big tankers—because insurance companies have canceled their policies. Trump has also offered US Navy ships to accompany the tankers through the Strait kill zone. But so far, no takers.
The Pentagon has had a vivid model of this situation for 25 years. —The model it tested and then rejected, because the truth was too embarrassing.
In other words, the truth was not the real goal of the 2002 Millennium Challenge war game exercise. Protecting the nation wasn’t the goal. Protecting the precious asses of US military big shots was the objective, when push came to shove.
Asserting ‘US military might is unbeatable’ was the narrative the Pentagon was selling. It was selling public relations.
Trump is now selling the same PR.
The American people are watching how that’s turning out in the real world. Day by day…
For as long as the Strait of Hormuz is choked off. Preventing 20% of global oil from passing through.
The problem is, no one is addressing the banking problem. Quite simply the banks create credit out of nothing, and then have the audacity to charge interest on the money they create out of the same nothing. Unless the way money is created, nothing, and I mean NOTHING, is going to change. You can talk about taxes, and hand outs, and this and that, till the cows come home, and it will make no difference at all. The government has the power to create legal tender and spend it into circulation. It was what Abe Lincoln did when the banksters of his day, who were willing to lend him all the money he needed to fight the civil war, but of course for a high rate of interest. So ole Abe printed money called green backs and gave it the backing of his government and spent it into circulation. Of course this annoyed the banksters and for his by-passing the bankers he wore a bullet. Yes, doing the right comes with, shall we say; certain risks. Is there anyone in Oz politics today who has the courage to take on the banksters AND DEFEAT THEM?
Article II, Section 4 of the United States Constitution establishes the grounds and scope for the removal of federal officials. It states that the President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from office upon impeachment for, and conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
We, the People, and Congress need to enforce this!
We all know how to fix it and we can start by supporting David Pocock's enquiry into our gas exports
Beautifully said Senator
Yes